Posted on 2 Comments

Leonen’s Friends Call the Impeachment Baseless vs. Gadon’s Summoning Evidence


By: Elena Grace Flores
YouTube Video by ANC 24/7

Ex-PH Supreme Court spox: Pursuing impeachment complaint vs. Justice Leonen will affect entire SC

Impeachment is Not Just to Get Rid of Leonen

A former Supreme Court spokesperson says that the House Committee on Justice has the option not to hear the impeachment complaint against Justice Marvic Leonen. This is if it does not find any merit to the case. Attorney Theodore Te also believes that the proceedings may set a precedent that can impact the entire Supreme Court. Leonen’s friends also call the ouster case baseless. However, Atty. Larry Gadon is confident of his summoning the SALN as his strong evidence.

Quo Warranto Difference

The court is an institution will survive, added Te. It will just simply render justice. The destructions should not count. May it be the emotional outpour of some colleagues and lawyers in favor of Leonen. More so with Bongbong Marcos’ plea to inhibit Leonen from his election protest against Leni Robredo. The former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno’s removal through a quo warranto petition was filed directly at the Supreme Court. The impeachment complaint is now at the Congress.

Impeachment Must Stay on the Grounds

Just like the case of former Chief Justice Renato Corona. He’s a dignified man with very good reputation. He was impeached just because of failing to submit his SALN. It happened when most public officials were not yet keen in doing it. Why should Leonen be spared? Atty. Gadon would not site the evidence if he did not do his home work yet.

2 thoughts on “Leonen’s Friends Call the Impeachment Baseless vs. Gadon’s Summoning Evidence

  1. Kick his ass now hindi kwalipikado katulad ni Sereno pinulot lang sa paaralan walang alam sa pagka judge walang eksperensya pinulot lang ni Abnoy Aquino para protektahan sya

  2. Justice Leonen should do his job he is one of the highest position in the government and should act as a good example since he was appointed by a lazy President he did nothing about the cases filed, He is also lazy why he is there doing nothing he deserved to be out much more he is also corrupt due to his failure to declare his assets I call him undesirable in his position he should be replaced by a better more qualified one

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.