Posted on

Why Bongbong Marcos Must Not Allow Supreme Court to Use the ERs for the VP Recount?

supreme court


By: Elena Grace Flores

(Please rewrite for new tone: keyword- Supreme Court)

Atty. Glenn Chong’s questions the PET resolution, saying that the printed election returns will only be used in the initial cutting by ballot. There’s a big question at this point. The election returns or result of the election and the report or summary of the ballot and votes are both inspired by the single document only – the ballot images or image of the ballot that the machine took after entering the voter’s ballot in the VCM. Mr. Edmund Casino of the Computer Society of the Philippines expresses his disgust over the decrypted images that prove to be not the replica of the original ballots. This alone he said is a violation of the election law. The Supreme Court recently rules to use the election returns as the basis of the recount after setting aside the threshold dispute.

YouTube video by Innovation Philippines

[VIDEO]: Mr. Edmund Casino, an IT expert slams SMARTMATIC, calls it incompetent and unacceptable to the Filipino electorate.


Data Illustration

In the image is a report from precinct 17040010 in Bombon, CAMARINES SUR. This report will be visible to the of sections of this report from the machine and the explanations in these data.

Lost Ballots in the Supreme Court Count

In the vice presidential contest, we can see all the votes read and counted by the machine (no one voted + so much voted + all votes obtained by all candidates) were 667 only. But according to the machine, there were 679  votes and 679 used ballots during the poll. Why 667 votes only were read by the machine? Where are the 12 votes that should be counted? The Supreme Court gag order is successful covering this up.


Ambiguous Marks

See the report where the 12 votes have been placed. If it’s abstentions, it means the voter has no vote. It should be in the under-votes because there is no vote. But why place in abstentions? It’s clear that there is an ambiguous character or an un-clear mark that the machine does not know. The 5 % to 20 % of markings in the oval space actually serve as ambiguous marks. This is why the Supreme Court must not adhere to the 25% plea of the presumptive VP, Leni Robredo.



Cheating Strategy

The alien marking or a small dot (5 % to 20 % of the oval space) in the oval of the fraudulent candidate for the position to be deceived allows the machine to classify it as a vote for the cheater before it reaches the voter’s hand. When the voter voted any candidate in this position except the fraudulent candidate with a small dot (ambiguous mark) at the oval, the voter’s vote for the voted candidate is not counted even if the round-shaped shading area is marked. This is because there is an ambiguous mark in one of the candidates in such a position. It will go to the abstentions. The Supreme Court must scrutinize this.


Be Knowledgeable

But if the fraudulent candidate with a small dot is voted by the voter, of course, the mark will be made in the round-shaped shading area. It will be counted for the cheater because the ambiguous mark will be lost at the oval of this candidate. That’s just simple and logical for programmers. How many votes did get in this way? There were 92,509 ports that opened on the election day. Let’s say at least 12 each is in this nature and the average measure is 25 % (yes, that 25 %!), it will reach 370,036 votes per precinct. It can definitely win the VP post!



Posted on

This is Why Bongbong Marcos should be the Vice President after the Election in 2016

election





By: Elena Grace Flores

Pnoy once vowed that he will do everything in his power to block the return of another Marcos. He even asked then Vice President Jejomar Binay to stop Bongbong Marcos’ bid for Vice President. To the contrary, Binay told him to give an honest election but to his dismay. They have gathered evidence that the election 2016 is the most fraudulent ever in the history of the country. Atty. Glenn Chong also goes full time in disclosing his evidence that would benefit Marcos. Series of hints also start to come out from the President’s speeches as well.





Youtube video YouTube Video by; Innovation Philippines

[VIDEO]: DAYAAN SA ELEKSYON 2016?




Atty. Glenn Chong’s Revelations

Chong feels compelled to study the structure of these automated systems, he explains. After all, he has been a victim of fraudulent elections as well. He even spearheaded the Tanggulang Demokrasya. This aims to really scrutinize what happened in the previous elections. There is a key difference between manual and automated elections as he explains. In manual elections where the anomalies have to be done manually, they are very susceptible to perception. However, in automated systems, anomalies will not be so obvious unless an expert really checks.




Smartmatic-Comelec Connivance

There is a significant difference between the number of votes from the central server and the transparency server as Chong claims. Allegedly, because of the conspiracy between Smartmatic and Comelec. However as the Senate is looking for answers, the people involved are away. Both Andy Bautista, Comelec’s ex-chair, and Smartmatic’s Marlon Garcia are seeking asylum overseas.

Chong’s Appeal and Warning for the Election

Chong is now appealing to the Senate. He is asking the senators to interrogate Atty. Jose Tolentino, the poll body’s executive director. Is Atty. Tolentino a suspect? Razon is asking Chong. He is not really a suspect according to Chong but nevertheless, he will really interrogate him. Chong is also asking senator-friend to shed light on the issue and come out publicly. He can name him only during the hearing if pressured to do so.








Many Senators Agree with Atty. Glenn Chong

According to Atty. Glenn Chong, he has a Senator-friend who is aware of the fraudulent nature of the 2016 national election. He claims that this Senator is convinced of the evidence that he presented. This is what he tells Kuya Daniel Razon when he appeared in Razon’s show “Get it Straight with Daniel Razon”. In an executive session, the Senators themselves even, have acknowledged the fraudulent nature of the election.




The Philippine Society for IT Professionals

Just by altering a simple code, Edmund Casino says that you can greatly influence the VP election results. It was known nationwide that Bongbong was on the lead consistently on the 2016 election. But then, his count drastically declined when the illegal correction was placed. The rest of the votes after insertion should be voided as this is a direct tampering violation. They should be evaluated forensically. And with this, it should be clear that Bongbong Marcos should have been the VP and not Leni Robredo, Casino explains.

Posted on

IT Expert Edmund Casino: VP Bongbong Marcos Won the Election at One Million Votes Lead

election





By: Elena Grace Flores

IT expert Edmund Casino is logical enough to quote the corresponding rule in the 1987 constitution on the mandate of the Comelec. He is very loud to say that they are incompetent or illiterate not to stop counting after a tampering act. It was a nationwide knowledge that Bongbong Marcos was leading at one million votes consistently during the 2016 election. The sudden shift of the total votes after the insertion of a correction can void the rest of the votes because direct tampering is a violation. Therefore, the rest is subject to forensic evaluation. In short, it should be VP Bongbong Marcos, not Leni Robredo.






Youtube video by; Innovation Philippines

[VIDEO]:  Mr. Edmund Casino, an IT expert slams SMARTMATIC, calls it incompetent and unacceptable to the Filipino electorate.




Obsolete Smartmatic System

The last four year elections are the proofs that Smartmatic is incapable of handling an integral election. Aside from the many anomalies, their system is obsolete. The local IT professionals can even build a much more reliable system. The Comelec is better off if they can revert to manual counting like in 1987.




Comelec People Do Not Know What they are Talking About

Casino addresses Senator Antonio Trillanes’ inquiry on any judgment of a protest. He vehemently said that the department is the juror, prosecutor, and judge. It can never make a clear and satisfactory decision. Smartmatic does not have the capability since 4 years ago and yet the Comelec is still using the digital election provider.

What you See is What You Get in an Election

The firm Mr. Casino criticizes the Comelec’s incompetence in understanding basic computer mechanics. They are not literate enough to even understand “WSIWYG” that stands for “What you see is what you get.” Meaning, whatever can be seen in the system must be the same in the image. This is in reference to the boxes found on the images when they are ovals in the actual voting forms.









Direct Tampering in the Middle of Transmission

Direct tampering in the middle of a live transmission is a violation. Results prior to that must be the legitimate one. They should have stopped counting and declare whatever the result was. Beyond that is already subject to forensic evaluation. This clearly means that Marcos is the legitimate Vice President.




Proclaim Bongbong Marcos

Despite the many cover-ups made by some officials and a majority of the mainstream media, unbiased people who have some sense can easily get the expert opinion of Casino. This is the reason why the Marcos loyalists are demanding for his proclamation at the soonest possible time. Comelec and Smartmatic must stop fooling the Filipinos now.