Posted on Leave a comment

Bongbong Marcos Responds to Robredo: 8,000 Witnesses are Election Officers from BEI

election





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores
If this will not make VP Leni Robredo ashamed of her camp, nothing would. Bongbong Marcos simply responds to her accusation by telling the truth. The witnesses are actually the election officers from the BEI and not registered voters. They are the watchers of the precincts. That made them more credible than ever.






Video by; Elena Grace Flores

[VIDEO]: Bongbong Marcos retaliates to Robredo’s accusation that he’s a liar by saying that his 8,000 witnesses are election officers who are members of the BEI and not registered voters. Therefore, they are in better position as such.




Marcos’ Lawyer Slams Robredo’s Camp

Marcos’ lawyer and spokesperson Vic Rodriguez slams Robredo’s camp for accusing them of “misleading” the Supreme Court (SC). This is allegedly by including “unregistered” voters in their list of proposed witnesses from Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao.




Board of Election Investigators

Rodriguez said that the investigators from the Board of Election or BEI are the witnesses. They are not the registered voters but the watchers. “Since the BEI members were physically present when the alleged ‘voting’ took place, they would be able to testify on whether the contested ballots had been pre-shaded or if an honest-to-goodness ‘election’ actually took place in Basilan, Lanao del Sur, and Maguindanao,” said Rodriguez.



Who are the Real Liars?

“We should allow the evidence to speak for itself. If and when that happens, the public can decide who the real liar is,” Rodriguez said. “All one has to do is to compare the signatures of the registered voters with the ‘signatures’ of the actual voters to realize that something fishy happened during the May 2016 elections. Now we know why BBM got zero votes in the Iglesia ni Cristo bailiwicks,” he added. Atty. Glenn Chong certainly has the basis of saying who the real liars are.









Technical and Forensic Examination

Rodriguez explains that this is why they want the PET to allow a technical and forensic examination of all election data in the 3 provinces. That should prove the authenticity of all the transmitted results. The PET has deferred action on this matter. Robredo should allow all evidence to surface if she is confident of her victory.



https://www.rappler.com/nation/189316-evidence-speak-for-itself-marcos-robredo-electoral-protest

Bongbong Marcos’ Election Protest NOT Enough to Get Rid of Smartmatic for 2019




Posted on Leave a comment

Bongbong Marcos: Why Does Robredo Demands Ballot Soft Copies WITHOUT Paying Liability?

Liability





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

Bongbong Marcos has opposed to Robredo’s Motion that she be allowed to secure soft copies of the printed ballot images. This from the ongoing Decryption activity of the COMELEC for Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. Marcos cannot figure out why Robredo suddenly wants them when she’s been opposing it ever since. She even did not help in paying the liability requirement.





Video by; News ThatMatter

[VIDEO]: Bongbong  Marcos said that election fraud can be verified in the technical examination.




No Liability Payment from Robredo

It will be recalled that the ongoing decryption activity was initiated solely by Marcos. He had to shoulder the decryption fee of Php 2.9M including an additional Php 2M for the initial supplies required by the COMELEC. Robredo did not join him in this undertaking. In fact, actively opposed the same as early as June 2017.




No Right to Demand

According to Marcos, since “Robredo did not contribute any share in the expenses and supplies, she should not be allowed by PET to obtain soft and even hard copies of the decrypted images of the ballots, election returns, audit logs and other relevant documents for all the protested clustered precincts of the pilot provinces.”



Just Shameless

Marcos has accused Robredo of cheating her way to the second highest office in the land. He lost to Robredo by a slim margin of about 260,000 votes in the 2016 national elections. Lawyer and I.T. expert Glenn Chong who has been involved in scrutinizing Smartmatic’s performance just refer to Robredo as a big liar.









Pointing Fingers

Recently, Robredo’s camp released a media propaganda accusing Marcos of forging the list of 8,000 election fraud witnesses mostly in his pilot areas.  The accusation boomeranged to her. ALDUB or Alyansang Du30-Bongbong or ALDUB members stood as witnesses to various incidents of election fraud in Basilan, Lamitan.



http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/15/1759195/marcos-argues-against-robredos-bid-ballot-soft-copies

ALDUB Testified against Robredo’s Accusation that Bongbong Marcos Forged Election Witnesses List