Posted on Leave a comment

Can Leonen Give Justice to Marcos’ Election Protest this January?


By: Elena Grace Flores
YouTube Video by Arclight Channel

News Leak on Associate Justice Marvic Leonen

How Yellow is Associate Justice Leonen?

Atty. Larry Gadon criticizes Associate Justice Leonen for sitting on Bongbong Marcos’ election protest for 7 months. Then, issues a one-paragraph comment resolution. Such work can take less than a month only. If he’s really certain that Leni Robredo’s party did not cheat, he can already do the move for the October 2019 case in November of the same year. What the Dilawans are doing is to delay the case through numerous petitions. As an appointee of former President Nonoy Aquino, he needs to do his part for their own interest.

News Leak on Leonen’s Plan

The Manila Times said that after almost one year of sitting on the case, Leonen would release a new resolution that will get Marcos’ protest moving again. The last time Leonen acted on the case was last September 30, when he solicited the comments of the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) and the Commission on Elections (Comelec).

Possible Ruling

The source also said that Leonen assures the court that he might finally issue a ruling. This ia almost four months. The case is under the Presidential Electoral Tribunal’s review. The question is how just can a Dilawan be to somebody like Marcos? It looks like he can cause a riot or just prolonging the people’s vengeange until the 2022 elections.

Posted on 1 Comment

Robredo’s Counter-Protest can be Dismissed by Supreme Court because she cannot Solicit

Supreme Court

welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

Bongbong Marcos said that it is clear in the law that the counter-protest of Leni Robredo can be dismissed for failing to pay to the Supreme Court the initial deposit as ordered by the Supreme Court. They can argue all they can but they should comply first.

Youtube video by; ABS-CBN News
[VIDEO]: The lawyer of former senator Bongbong Marcos is accusing the camp of VP Leni Robredo of delaying the election protest proceedings after the latter sought clarification from the tribunal about its order that she pay for her protest.

Willing to Pay

Robredo’s legal counsel, Maria Bernadette Sardillo said that they are willing to pay the amount, but only at a later time after the tribunal resolves their motion to determine that there is a basis for the recount to happen. The Marcos camp also asks the Supreme Court to lower the bond based on the number of clustered precincts involved and not per registered precinct.

No Capacity to Pay Yet

Sardillo said that Robredo does not have the capacity to pay the P15 million.  This is the reason why they need to come up with the funds. This is fairly difficult at the first tranche of P8 million. The PET requires this payment for the expenses of ballot recount in more than 8,000 clustered precincts. The Vice President’s 2015 statement of assets, liabilities and net worth shows that her net worth is only at ₱8.7 million.

Robredo cannot Solicit

Since Robredo is a public official, she cannot solicit like what Marcos did. Based on Republic Act 6713, officials and employees shall not solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or anything of monetary value from any person in the course of their official duties. This is why they are buying time to come up with an acceptable source of funds.

Marcos’ Advantage

Marcos is now a private citizen and thereby can collect donations. The ₱36 million he paid to the PET was from friends and supporters collected complete the first tranche in a manager’s check. If the tribunal sets Marcos’ protest in motion, his lawyer is confident that three material witnesses can directly prove fraud in the vice-presidential election. He insinuates that they are in a protective custody right now and their testimony will be very very damaging to Robredo, Rodriguez said.