Posted on

Whose Voters are NOT Real People?: Bongbong Marcos Reacts on Robredo’s Discrediting the Supreme Court or the PET

supreme court





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

acting workshop

Bongbong Marcos clearly pinpoints Supreme Court Associate Justice Benjamin Caguioa, the magistrate in charge of his election protest before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), for obvious biases against him. However, Vice President Leni Robredo discredits the whole institution by urging it to give her a fair fight on air.  She wants the 25% COMELEC’s threshold guide for the recount instead of the PET’s 5o% ruling. She banks on her motion for reconsideration on this matter that Marcos detests since he knows that most of her votes are from the PCOS machine. Isn’t she the one who said that her opponent has supporters who are not real people? The PET made its decision after various anomalies are found during the recount of Camarines Sur’s ballots, her bailiwick.







Youtube video by; FILIPINEWS

[VIDEO]: ‘You cannot change the rule in the middle of the game’ Robredo gagawin ang lahat para manalo

The Supreme Court to Give Robredo a Fair Fight?

Robredo recently asks the Tribunal to reverse its earlier ruling that rejects her appeal to apply the 25 percent threshold for the ongoing vote recount. With her are legal counsels Romulo Macalintal and Bernadette Sardillo. They personally troop to the Supreme Court, that sits as the PET. This is to file the motion for reconsideration. The VP addresses her supporters outside the SC compound where she urges the PET to give her a fair fight.




Cheated her Way to the OVP

Lawyer Vic Rodriguez, spokesperson of Marcos, in a statement, said that the vice president should stop “casting aspersions meant to debase [the Presidential Electoral Tribunal’s] integrity.” “Robredo cheated her way to the vice presidency and in this [ongoing] manual recount and judicial revision, she is attempting to cheat the Filipino people again by trying to change the rules in the middle of the game,” the lawyer added.




Marcos’ Number of Voters Remains the Same at 50%

Barangay Laganac, Municipality of Balatan, Camarines Sur where Robredo got 358 votes are in Robredo’s plea. Upon the application of the 50 percent threshold, the physical recount on the ballot yielded 346 votes for the vice president. Votes for Marcos did not change in the tally. “[I]n simple terms, the votes for the VP decreases by 12 votes while the votes for Marcos remains the same,” the motion reads.




Whose Voters are NOT Real People?

Criticize Bongbong Marcos and your friend would either fight with you or unfriend you via Facebook. Whereas, Robredo’s online presence is seldom felt. Aside from the many Filipinos who are in shame every time she speaks in front of an international audience, most online defenders of the unpopular VP seem to be incognito or trolls as she describes them.

Is Robredo Accusing the Supreme Court of NOT Giving her a Fair Fight?

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/04/19/1807466/marcos-camp-robredo-should-stop-tainting-pets-integrity

Posted on

Hear Macalintal’s Difficulty in Justifying Revisors’ 5,000 Votes Discrepancy Disclosure in Favor of Bongbong Marcos

votes





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

acting workshop

The PET revisors said that the recount of 210 clustered precincts brings the lead of VP Leni Robredo down to about 258,000 votes. “It’s still a long way to go. However, the figures can already be a substantial recovery or change in the results of the elections. It is definitely favorable to former Senator Bongbong Marcos,” a PET insider said. Robredo’s lawyer, Atty. Romulo  Macalintal disputes this through a radio program. Simply judge from his fact-twisting answers.







Youtube video by; ABS-CBN News

[VIDEO]: The lawyer of Vice President Leni Robredo denied Tuesday news reports that their camp lost as many as 5,000 votes in the 2016 vice-presidential election manual recount after some ballots were allegedly deemed invalid due to improper shading.

Observations and Not Official Report?

Robredo won the vice presidency with a lead of 263,473 votes over Marcos during the 2016 election. In the official tally, Robredo obtained 14,418,817 votes while Marcos had 14,155,344. Even Macalintal admits that it can be the revisors’ observation that the said the recount of 210 clustered precincts narrowed the lead of his client down to about 258,000.




Alliance with the COMELEC

Macalintal said that he cannot believe the discrepancy of 5,000 votes in the VP election manual recount in favor of Marcos. This is allegedly due to some ballots deemed invalid because of improper shading.He points out that the Commission on Elections already issues a resolution that said ballots with one-fourth shading are still valid for counting.




The PET’s Gag is in the Way

The PET can file a show cause order to both camps all they want but in reality, they deny the people with their rights to know where their votes went. Atty. Glenn Chong insists that he is not under such order so he can publicize every single detail what he learns as the revision of ballots progresses. This goes the same with bloggers and other social media personalities, and even the media. It is also unfair to the public to make the updates secret since public interest is very high. Transparency in a democratic country seems to be lacking in this regard. This is purely undemocratic.




Surely but Surely turning to Marcos’ Favor

Marcos accuses Robredo of  “massive electoral fraud, anomalies, and irregularities.” Pre-shading of ballots, pre-loaded Secure Digital cards, the misreading of ballots, and, malfunctioning vote-counting machines to name a few. An “abnormally high” undervotes were also obvious. The PET can’t easily hide these if it’s true that some Supreme Court justices are favoring Robredo. Therefore, they better save the dignity of their branch. Perhaps by allowing the truth to come out but in a less scandalous way.

Just Grab the Gag? Is the Supreme Court’s Marcos-Robredo Gag Order Undemocratic?

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/04/17/18/lawyer-denies-vp-robredo-lost-5000-votes-over-shading-limit

http://www.manilatimes.net/vp-robredos-lead-narrows-in-recount/393129/

Posted on

Future Senator Imee Marcos Slams Macalintal on Gag Order and Typhoon Theory

Senator





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

acting workshop

Popular bet for Senator, Gov. Imee Marcos and the very supportive sister of Bongbong Marcos defends their lawyer, Atty. George Garcia in speaking in front of the media. She said that Garcia is so careful about what to say so as not to disobey the gag order. While VP Robredo’s camp via her legal adviser, Atty. Romulo Macalintal even holds a press conference to counteract the younger Marcos’ observations on Bato, Camarines Sur’s wet ballots, cracked ballot boxes, and missing audit logs.








Youtube video by; Elena Grace Flores

The popular senator to be Gov. Imee Marcos explains how ridiculous the other camp’s reactions were on Bongbong Marcos’ observations on tampered Bato ballots during the first day of the recount for the VP post.

Freshly Made Wet

Gov. Marcos can’t help but flash her lovable smile when she stresses that the wet ballots are freshly made. They do not look like they were affected by the typhoon last December and until this April, they are still wet. Macalintal earlier said that it was normal because of the bad weather last year.




Weatherproof Ballot Boxes?

Marcos, who is running for Senator questions the so-called weatherproof ballot boxes. If they really are what they should be, why are they made of plastic, with masking tape around, and most of all wet?




Excess Ballots

Marcos added that excess ballots are normal in an election. This happens when the elderly made mistakes in filling up the form, accidentally wet and the ballot becomes eligible to read. However, if they are freshly made wet, then that’s another story.




Why is Macalintal so Defensive?

The audit logs do not contain a tally of votes, which is the subject of the recount. Thus making their disappearance a “technical defect” that “can never affect the genuineness and accuracy of the count,” Macalintal said. Ballots in previous elections were also not safe from typhoons and floods. This is not a cause for concern because of the ballot images of the automated system, he added. So, what is the purpose of the weather-proof ballot boxes then? Does he insinuate to use the encrypted images that Bongbong Marcos is still asking for the PET to give him copies after paying over 7 million Pesos?

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/04/02/18/marcos-some-ballots-wet-audit-logs-missing-in-robredo-stronghold

Did Macalintal Just Hint Why they Made some Ballots Wet at the Supreme Court?

Posted on

Early Anomalies on VP Recount Observed by Bongbong and Imee Marcos

recount





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

acting workshop

Bongbong Marcos as seconded by his sister, Gov. Imee Marcos discloses that while the Bato, Camarines Sur ballots are gathered for the recount today, some are wet. In other boxes,  the audit logs are missing. He added that these are obvious signs that the questionable ballot boxes were opened prior to today’s initial recount in connection with his electoral protest against Vice President Leni Robredo.








Youtube video by; Elena Grace Flores

Wet ballots and missing audit logs are few of the anomalies observed by Bongbong Marcos and sister Gov. Imee. CNN Philippines Full Video Here.

Finally Happening

The recount finally happens two years after Marcos brings his electoral protest to the Supreme Court that sits as the PET. He lost to Robredo by a slim margin of 263,473 votes. The PET earlier announces that if there’s not enough discrepancy in the pilot provinces, the electoral protest of Marcos may end there. His chosen areas are Camarines Sur, Iloilo, and Negros Oriental, Robredo’s bailiwicks.




Early Anomalies of Recount Explained

Former Senator Marcos explains that the ballots that are wet are set aside. The sabotage act cannot happen two years ago. Someone may have the splash just prior to today’s event. The audit logs are also essential to determine the transmission date of the report.




Words from Robredo’s Camp

Atty Romulo Macalintal said that most electoral protests are not successful because the results of the manual ballot count tally exactly with that of the vote-counting machines (VCMs) and the consolidated canvassing system. However, Marcos’ protest is the only case that reaches this far in the national level.




Patience Counts

“We have endured two years of waiting due to Robredo’s habitual and intentional moves to delay the election protest and deliberate attempts to bury the truth,” Marcos’ spokesperson Atty. Vic Rodriguez said in a statement.  Bongbong and Imee Marcos are in the Supreme Court in the early hours of April 2, 2018, to visit their supporters who are in vigil since February 7.

http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/04/01/leni-robredo-bongbong-marcos-vote-recount.html

Resistance vs. Imee Marcos: Does PI Need to Wait for Election 2019 Winners to Start Deuterium Extraction?

Posted on

Why do Attacks on Du30 Intensify as Bongbong Marcos’ Election Protest Win Nears?

election





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

Philippine President Rodrigo Du30 hails the late President Ferdinand Marcos as a hero for many Filipinos. He stresses this during the former leader’s 100th birth anniversary. The opposition takes it as a campaign to rehabilitate the image of Marcos to help Bongbong Marcos’ political comeback. The younger Marcos’ election protest against VP Leni Robredo now results in a recount on March 19. He earlier discloses evidence of massive digital frauds. Now Atty. Romulo Macalintal appears to be lawyering for the Comelec. He claims that the squares are a new feature – that the parties apparently know of. He refers to the presence of the squares in the ballot images. Marcos’ spokesperson then dares him to produce any briefing made by the Comelec on the presence of the squares. Macalintal has not replied up to this time of writing.










Youtube video by; FILIPINEWS
[VIDEO]: DUTERTE PINAGTANGGOL SI FERDINAND MARCOS SA BUMABATIKOS SA KANYA! “HE WAS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT”




Same Accusations

Duterte, who faces the same accusations of major human rights abuses as Marcos, is a friend of the Marcos family. His detractors said that he plays a key role to bolster their efforts to regain the top echelons of political power. Marcos stepped down in 1986 to avoid bloodshed during the EDSA revolution. He died in exile in Hawaii three years later after the late President Cory Aquino disallowed him to return to the Philippines. He wanted to explain the alleged hidden wealth but Aquino refused. His enemies continue to accuse him of embezzling billions of dollars during his rule. That turns out to be a security seal for the welfare of humanity. Now, they aggressively launch a black propaganda against Du30 for the same reasons.



The President’s Dare to Resign

In October last year, Duterte dared Sereno and Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales to resign with him, saying the two had allowed themselves to be “used” in the corruption allegations against him. Sereno is battling an impeachment complaint that alleged she had undeclared wealth and betrayed public trust, among others. House lawmakers are expected to resolve within the month if there is probable cause for her impeachment.



Supreme Court CJ can be Fired

Leyte Rep. Vicente Veloso, vice-chairman of the House Committee on Justice, said Sereno only submitted one of her Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net worth (SALNs) to the Judicial and Bar Council when the panel was deliberating on the new Chief Justice in 2012, despite a notice from the council directing applicants to submit all of their SALNs. A decision from the Supreme Court in 1963 established that “if at the time of appointment, petitioner did not have necessary qualifications for the office…then he did not have the right to be there,” said Veloso.




VP Electoral Protest Update

Marcos’ lawyer emphasizes that Macalintal is just being consistently untrue or he had a special briefing from Comelec exclusively for the then ruling Liberal Party. Either way, the existence of the square is an unlawful insertion and alteration of the digital image. Their excuses are so feeble and insulting to the intelligence of the Filipino electorate as it provides them too little too late, said Atty. Rodriguez. The squares should not be there because, during the source code review, no boxes were shown. If ever, the boxes must have been added after the source code review which is against the law, he added.




http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/02/16/18/duterte-can-fire-sereno-lawmaker

How Marcos’ Humanity Wealth Caused Bongbong-Leni War and Du30 Destabilization?