Posted on Leave a comment

Atty. Glenn Chong’s Smartmatic Fraud Evidence is Undisputable

fraud




By: Elena Grace Flores
YouTube Video by PHILIPPINES MEDIA COVERAGE




Atty. Glenn Chong Claims explains his certified true copy evidence.

Smartmatic Fraud Evidence

During the vengeful impeachment of the late former SC Chief Justice Renato Corona, Atty. Glenn Chong presents his evidence of Smartmatic fraud at the Senate. The late Sixto Brilliante cannot dispute them because they are certified true copies. Former Senator Juan Ponce Enrile was a witness. The Comelec admits in the executive session that the only way to get those cases was through fraud. They refused to speak during the hearing at the plenary.


Scrutinizing The Comelec

Chong said that he did not hesitate to scrutinize the Comelec regarding the data he collected. Like the transmissions made prior to the election. That means, the results were ready even before the poll in some presincts. These can be obtained from the machine by technical people. The proofs were not only on the records but also certified. So, they can stand in court.

No Smartmatic for Clean Elections

It is Chong’s goal to convince the Senate to block Smartmatic for future elections. His proofs are relevant to Bongbong Marcos’ election protest against the presumptive Vice President Leni Robredo. Judging from Chongs revelations, massive fraud was likely in 2016.

Posted on Leave a comment

The Supreme Court Cannot Dismiss Marcos’ Protest after Recount Due to Fraud

fraud




By: Elena Grace Flores
YouTube Video by Rappler




Supreme Court moves in VP protest, Comelec to weigh in on Mindanao votes

The Supreme Court Cannot Dismiss Marcos’ Case Due to Fraud

The Supreme Court did not make a decision after the recount. It did not answer Bongbong Marcos’ motion to rule on the appreciation of votes. The PET moves to the third cause of action. This is the annulment of votes in Mindanao where physical evidence is required. Meaning to say that the more than 15,000 excess votes of Leni Robredo after the recount are questionable. So, fraud is more likely.


Revision and Appreciation of Votes

The revision of the ballots in pilot provinces had the following
objectives: verify the actual physical count of the ballots; recount the votes of the parties; record the parties’ objections and claims thereon; and mark the ballots objected to and/or claimed by the parties in preparation for their examination by the Tribunal and for the reception of the parties’ evidence.

After the revision, the revised ballots were then subjected to
appreciation wherein the Tribunal verified the physical count and ruled on the objections and claims of the parties. The final tally after the revision and the appreciation of the votes in the pilot provinces resulted in a net increase of votes by 15,093 in favor of the protestee. However, the SC did not dismiss the case. It can only mean that there’s basically fraud.

Dissenting Opinion that Prevents the Dismissal

The word “may” in Rule 65 refers to the discretion of the Tribunal to
dismiss or not the protest, and if the Tribunal does not dismiss the protest, to require the protestant to designate “not more than three” pilot provinces, a mandatory ceiling. The word “may” recognizes that the Tribunal may summarily dismiss the protest, in which event there will be no reason to require the designation of pilot provinces. But if the Tribunal does not dismiss the protest, there will be a need to designate “not more than three” pilot provinces. The word “may” has never been interpreted to pertain to the number of pilot provinces, which must be “not more than three,” a language which is a clear mandatory command that the number of pilot provinces shall not exceed three.

Posted on 1 Comment

Robredo is on Atty. Glenn Chong’s Tail Prior to Election Hearing

election





By: Elena Grace Flores

A public hearing happens on September 13, 2018. It is a Joint Congressional Oversight Committee on the Automated Election System (JCOC-AES) event at the Senate Session Hall, 2nd Floor, Senate of the Philippines at 10:00 AM which is open to the public. Prior to this, the camp of Vice President Leni Robredo asks the Supreme Court’s Presidential Electoral Tribunal to investigate how the audit logs from Camarines Sur came into possession of lawyer Glenn Chong.




Youtube video by News5Everywhere

[VIDEO]: Gustong malaman ng kampo ni VP Robredo kung paano nakakuha ng kopya ng audit logs ng Camarines Sur si Atty. Chong.




Disturbed by Chong

Atty. Macalintal finds it disturbing for Chong being able to get a copy of the audit logs from Ragay. He claims to have no connection to the parties involved. However, on his Facebook page back on March 9, he posted a portion of the audit logs. Furthermore, he even presented them to the Senate committee on a hearing. Moreover, Chong consistently denies being a representative of Marcos. Senator Drilon, however, confronts him for having two authorization letters from the Marcos’ camp.



Origin of the Audit Logs

Chong testified under oath that h hot the audit logs from SET. However, Macalintal is saying that Ragay was not covered by the election protest filed by Francis Tolentino before the SET. Consequently, the Commission on Elections did not submit the audit logs to SET. Both Marcos’ and Robredo’s camps were able to obtain soft copies of the decrypted ballot images and audit logs from Ragay, according to Macalintal.


Macalintal’s Challenging Threats

Macalintal is informing the PET that despite claiming to not be a representative of Marcos, Chong still possesses copies of the resolutions of PET and pleadings that were submitted by the parties. Chong was also present during the closure activities of Comelec which Macalintal challenges because only the representatives of the parties were allowed to observe. Furthermore, Chong was even one of the witnesses in the first cause of action of Marcos. Macalintal is accusing Chong of attempting to preempt any resolution of the PET by swaying public opinion through the discussion of the merits of the case on his Facebook.



Chong’s Counter Challenge for the Election

Chong is saying that the first few pages of their 35-page manifesto clearly shows them trying to fool the Supreme Court. They use only select parts of the transcript to make their version believable. This move, Chong believes, is because Robredo’s camp can’t destroy him so they’re trying their chances on the Supreme Court. He is challenging them to bring out all they can on the September 13 hearing.




Desperate Move to Silence Chong

Robredo’s camp is desperate  to prove that he is a representative of Marcos so that he will be under the gag order as well, according to Chong. He is saying that they could not fight the knowledge of the fraud in the elections spreading. They may have paid the mainstream media, but they cannot handle the social media, according to Chong. Consequently, they are trying to silence him.



Posted on Leave a comment

Bongbong Marcos: Why Does Robredo Demands Ballot Soft Copies WITHOUT Paying Liability?

Liability





welcome By: Elena Grace Flores

Bongbong Marcos has opposed to Robredo’s Motion that she be allowed to secure soft copies of the printed ballot images. This from the ongoing Decryption activity of the COMELEC for Camarines Sur, Iloilo and Negros Oriental. Marcos cannot figure out why Robredo suddenly wants them when she’s been opposing it ever since. She even did not help in paying the liability requirement.





Video by; News ThatMatter

[VIDEO]: Bongbong  Marcos said that election fraud can be verified in the technical examination.




No Liability Payment from Robredo

It will be recalled that the ongoing decryption activity was initiated solely by Marcos. He had to shoulder the decryption fee of Php 2.9M including an additional Php 2M for the initial supplies required by the COMELEC. Robredo did not join him in this undertaking. In fact, actively opposed the same as early as June 2017.




No Right to Demand

According to Marcos, since “Robredo did not contribute any share in the expenses and supplies, she should not be allowed by PET to obtain soft and even hard copies of the decrypted images of the ballots, election returns, audit logs and other relevant documents for all the protested clustered precincts of the pilot provinces.”



Just Shameless

Marcos has accused Robredo of cheating her way to the second highest office in the land. He lost to Robredo by a slim margin of about 260,000 votes in the 2016 national elections. Lawyer and I.T. expert Glenn Chong who has been involved in scrutinizing Smartmatic’s performance just refer to Robredo as a big liar.









Pointing Fingers

Recently, Robredo’s camp released a media propaganda accusing Marcos of forging the list of 8,000 election fraud witnesses mostly in his pilot areas.  The accusation boomeranged to her. ALDUB or Alyansang Du30-Bongbong or ALDUB members stood as witnesses to various incidents of election fraud in Basilan, Lamitan.



http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/15/1759195/marcos-argues-against-robredos-bid-ballot-soft-copies

ALDUB Testified against Robredo’s Accusation that Bongbong Marcos Forged Election Witnesses List